It is easy to break an arrow. Difficult it is to break a beam of them. Japanese saying Support is the word of a new order, a new vision of world. Used ad they nauseam in the medias and in the society in general, its meaning still little is understood by to be something new, unknown and for having a transversal and including approach in almost all the areas of sciences human beings. This made that this inspired cause not yet was spread of form to create a critical mass of leaders to defend it. To more clearly leave the concept of this neologism, support can be defined as the creation and the disponibilizao for the society of foundations economic, social and ambient perennial, that can be usufructed of form joust and igualitria for all the current and future, originary generations of any social classroom, creed or culture.
Support is to construct to solid and perennial foundations in all the social angles. It is to search the balance, to to make the certain things, in the certain way, with perspective of long stated period in the use them global resources. It must be had holistic vision of the phenomenon in comment and be taken in account economic, social and ambient the impacts involved next to stakeholders, to produce goods and services lasting. To occur the full support, the alignment of the three sectors of the economy becomes necessary: the first sector, the public power (governments), withholds the power, but with little effectiveness; as the sector, the private power (companies), possesss the capital but it lacks for times the credibility to it; the third sector (ONGs) has ideas, but sparing financial resources. Articulated, planned and agreed to actions in local scope enter all the sectors of the society create the synergy of a governana process that potencializa the abilities, the knowledge and the experiences of all the involved sectors, to improve the quality of life and the social conviviality.
According to Viegas (2005), based in the thought of Edgar Morin (1999), the complexity, directed toward the ambient education can be understood as the negation of two paradigms: the cartesian one, that it all divides in parts and the holistic one, that only visualizes all. For Morin we must very have a vision beyond these paradigms, being the complexity the visualization of the reality. When understanding the visualized reality, another new reality is presented in them creating anelamento consequentemente enters the understanding of the reality and the construction of the reality, generating a constant uncertainty of the knowledge. Morin (1999) tries to explain the complexity through principles. One of them is turned toward the order, clutter and organization of the auto-organization systems.
Being able to be understood from the relations between all and the part, being all superior the addition of the parts, at the moment where it does not obtain to understand the separate reality of all. But it also can be inferior, limiting the expression of elements, and at the same time different of the addition of the parts, because both when isolated they become different of when are part of the system. The complexity is the constant transformation created by the order and clutter in the system, produced for unexpected reactions, action and consequentemente interactions. In this direction the world understanding must be become free of the paradigm simplified-reducionista, that separates nature, society, thought and feeling, in disabling to dialogue critically on the organized world. Practical the ambient educators must be intent its still alicerado in the simplified-reducionista paradigm. According to Guimares, (2004) we must, as future ambient educators, to carry through an exercise of disruption of the traps that the paradigms present in them. In the current ticket, of modernity for after-modernity, he has a great necessity of a more complex thought.
Recently in the city of Ivinhema, interior of the state of Mato Grosso Of the South, the possible establishment of an alcohol plant and sugar generated quarrels on the consequences that this installation would bring to the population and the environment of the region. Those that is favorable are based on the fact of that hundreds of new jobs will be generated, occupying of this form it has left of the population currently dismissed what it will go to improve the condition of life of many inhabitants, the valuation of the property will increase the purchasing power of the proprietors of houses, small farms and farms that consequently will buy more and heat the sales in the commerce generating still more profits. However, I believe that the impacts caused for this plant will be bigger of what the advantages that the same one will bring, therefore with the burning of the sugar cane, air will be very poludo and the ground will be degraded in result of the cultivation of the sugar cane-of-sugar. Still, the great reduction of diverse agricultural cultures had to the strong incentive to the sugar cane plantation, with this reduction in the internal production the importation it will be inevitable, what tax to the consumer will increase the value of the end item. Statisticians point that the violence in small cities tends to grow vertiginously with the arrival of new companies, since most of the time does not exist urban infrastructure to follow the growth rhythm, this occurs due to lack of planejamentos that aim at the economic development not only, but the welfare and conditions of life of the population. Being thus, it is indispensable that for the installation of this plant it must be carried through an ample study and project, so that the negative effect are minimized, therefore contrary case the population will be penalizada by the planning lack.