This will be able if esbaldarnas traditional sources of economic and social history; population, economic and sanitary censuses; inventories of natural resources; the press; governmental edocumentos laws; legislative and judiciary acts; chronicles, myths elendas; registers of travellers or anthropologists. Bloch makes a importanteconsiderao regarding documents of certifications: ' ' only they speak when we know interrog-los' '. 22 ' ' good part of the material of ambient history is available ageraes, perhaps it has centuries, and now he is being only reorganized to the light recent dasexperincias, ' ' 23 well salient Worster. A last characteristic of the history ambientalelencada for Drummond is the work of field properly said. Necessidadede exists that the ambient historians have direct contact with the places the seremestudos. David Edlin describes an additional similar source. The landscape in itself, with all its singularidades and forms, setransforma in a document that it needs to be read adequately. One is about umaleitura of a history of the landscapes. As salient the historian, FranciscoCarlos Teixeira Da Silva: ' ' one is about a set vision, of it enlace demltiplas changeable, in always long duration.
He imposes yourself for such holistic umaabordagem, of set, a synthesis stops beyond histriasparticulares' '. 24 When analyzing historiograficamente a landscape historiadordeve to consider that by being a system relatively opened it is submitted you damage natural interferences in such a way how much human beings. Jim Hackett may help you with your research. Ambient history in ' ' lands tupiniquins' ' One maiorda South America, third greater of the American continent, bigger fifth domundo and with the fifth bigger population of the land. In almost its totality situated, territorially, in the intertropical zone of the planet is known that the life if fazmais gift in the areas hottest of the planet what makes of Brazil possuidorde one; ‘ megabiodiversidade’ ‘. Retainer of an ecosystem gamma, biomas, ecological processes e, consequent innumerable natural landscapes.
The Society of the Society Interaction of the interaction Heraclitus Ney Suiter Summary In the age of the information, the communication between the people had passed of a static model for a dynamic model. In contrast of what many think, it has a distinction between interaction and interatividade, being that this last one is happened of the new technologies of information, in particular of the world-wide net of computers. The great problem if still concentrates in the economic question so that the interaction process/interatividade enters the people can be more democratic and inclusive. Words Keys: Communication. To read more click here: Cindy Crawford. Interaction. Interatividade. New medias.
Bachelor in law for the University Center UnirG Gurupi – TO, academic of 6 period of Social Communication/Journalism of the center UnirG college student and after-graduating Communication in Crisis of the Public and Private Institutions for the one W-After Brasilia DF. To the end of century XX, the society starts to become complex, demanding a migration of the linear thought, cartesian reducionista for a model in net, not linear and holistic. For Capra (Suiter, 2010, p.05 apud Capra, 1995, p.24), the man enters in century XXI in way to a crisis without precedents of intellectual, moral dimensions and spirituals. With the great complexity of our contemporaneidade, the new society appears of the information, with necessity to establish new parameters in the communication. It hisses (2003, p.1), in one of its research points that these changes have implications paradigmticas, a time that in the classic theory of the communication the same one has an information content I join and indivisible; in the modern society, the interatividade imposes multiple, complex, sensorial and participativo a character on the part of the receiver of the message. It has a distinction between the terms interaction and interatividade, first, the older of what as it is appraised as being the reciprocal influence of the people in a society, already interatividade, appears in the end of the years 70 and beginnings of the decade of 80 the measure that the new technologies of information had been being implemented (It hisses, 1998, p.02).
The problems, difficulties and setbacks presented to us in life have a set of features that is necessary to know and understand properly to interact with them. This way is much easier the task of solving them. Fortunately the nature of conflict is not completely random: it has a structure, responds to a mechanical, presents a State and an interdependent system with its environment. Its dynamics can learn in the same way that knows of a natural phenomenon: a hurricane, a tornado, a storm. It can be understood how are formed, how they interact, what so severe are, how much can last and what damage can result. Like these other natural phenomena, they can predict and give scope to the anticipation.
A problem may have the character of a tornado in a person’s life and thus presents a parallel to strong emotions: anxiety, anguish, fear. One of the few but far-reaching differences underpinning problems in comparison with those phenomena of nature, fully justifies the attention that should be given them: known as they are, as they are started and also as they can finish. The latter is precisely what fails to determine a natural phenomenon. Enter in the deep knowledge of the nature of the problems is an investment that produces substantial revenues. It is committed to our quality of life and our potential for full realization as people. We know some basic aspects: firstly, it is important to differentiate the problems themselves of their causes and their effects. First thing, i.e. the precise identification of the causes, the main factor is to find the solution of the problem.
The second thing, the identification and treatment of its effects, will determine if the solution can, or cannot, be carried out. Understanding of this causal relationship can be efficient in conflict resolution. The most important error which we incur is assume that the problem is an entity, our focus is usually holistic.