Considering the aspects that involve the established culture and in the considered text, searched through this summary to demonstrate the personal agreement in relation to the boarded content: Desconstruo of Cultural History. Complementarily, aiming at to the understanding of the concepts of culture presented by the authors mentioned in the text-base, some of the paradigms involve that them, as well as the consequncias of in addition the same ones had been studied. In accordance with the thought proposal presented in the text of Cultural History, the culture can be understood as a complex of accomplishments of a people in such a way in the material aspects how much in the spirituals, related with the humanity in determined time and place. The culture also understands the apprehended knowledge and the human behavior. Abilities which independem of the biological question (Tylor, apud Silva and Silva). The cultural question must be understood of Holistic form, that is, must be considered all the Inter-relations of the components of the way where the individual and its culture are inserted, in full agreement with the Platonic thought ‘ ‘ All man is a social, cultural being and poltico.’ ‘ (PLATO, without date). It enters the theories of eurocntrico character, of which we are fruits, it is possible to perceive the influence strict on Darwin to the evolucionista character, therefore its defenders nailed a scale of cultural evolution, with stages to be fulfilled throughout the time, in way to reach definitive advance. The breaking or desconstruo of this generalista concept, in accordance with Good cited in the text-base (ARAJO, 2010), it elapses of the fact of that ‘ ‘ all culture has a history prpria’ ‘ , that is, each people, tribe, or social group, among others, has its particular form of culture that cannot or must be compared with other cultures..
The problems, difficulties and setbacks presented to us in life have a set of features that is necessary to know and understand properly to interact with them. This way is much easier the task of solving them. Fortunately the nature of conflict is not completely random: it has a structure, responds to a mechanical, presents a State and an interdependent system with its environment. Its dynamics can learn in the same way that knows of a natural phenomenon: a hurricane, a tornado, a storm. It can be understood how are formed, how they interact, what so severe are, how much can last and what damage can result. Like these other natural phenomena, they can predict and give scope to the anticipation.
A problem may have the character of a tornado in a person’s life and thus presents a parallel to strong emotions: anxiety, anguish, fear. One of the few but far-reaching differences underpinning problems in comparison with those phenomena of nature, fully justifies the attention that should be given them: known as they are, as they are started and also as they can finish. The latter is precisely what fails to determine a natural phenomenon. Enter in the deep knowledge of the nature of the problems is an investment that produces substantial revenues. It is committed to our quality of life and our potential for full realization as people. We know some basic aspects: firstly, it is important to differentiate the problems themselves of their causes and their effects. First thing, i.e. the precise identification of the causes, the main factor is to find the solution of the problem.
The second thing, the identification and treatment of its effects, will determine if the solution can, or cannot, be carried out. Understanding of this causal relationship can be efficient in conflict resolution. The most important error which we incur is assume that the problem is an entity, our focus is usually holistic.